Skip to content
Saakshya

Topic

Articles tagged relying-party

Everything we've written on this topic, newest first.

  • 12 October 2026 · 5 min read

    Why an agent registry has to live outside any one company

    Large identity vendors reportedly let a company register its own AI agents in its own directory. That works inside the company. A hospital or tax office outside it still has nobody to ask about an agent that turns up. Closing that gap needs a register no single company owns.

  • 12 October 2026 · 5 min read

    Switch it off today: why revocation is the hard part

    Giving an agent permission takes one click. Making every office that relies on it stop, the same day you withdraw it, is much harder. Revocation has to reach offices you don't control, survive slow connections, and leave a record of when it took effect. Short lives help. They don't replace it.

  • 12 October 2026 · 5 min read

    What is agent identity?

    Agent identity is the set of facts an office can check about an AI agent before acting on its request. Which agent is this, which person or company stands behind it, and what is it allowed to do today. It is a record the office reads, not a claim the agent makes about itself.

  • 12 October 2026 · 5 min read

    Who is the relying party, and what should it check?

    The relying party is whichever bank, hospital or office is about to act on an agent's request. It should make six checks in order, covering a signed and unrevoked identity, an accountable owner, scope for this exact action, a narrowing delegation chain, data-protection status and written evidence. If a check fails, it says no.

  • 11 October 2026 · 5 min read

    Muse can act for you. Nothing outside Meta can check who it is.

    Meta describes careful controls inside its Muse personal agent, but they sit inside Meta, and nobody outside can verify them. A shop or bank that receives a Muse request sees a session, not an accountable owner or a scope. We think the receiving office should check facts the agent can't write itself.

  • 18 September 2026 · 6 min read

    Read-only is a permission. It isn't an identity.

    A read-only label says what an agent may do. It doesn't say which agent acted, who answers for it, or how to stop that one without stopping the rest. The DseWiki case, as researchers and reporters describe it, shows the gap. Scope belongs on a credential. Identity is a name you can revoke.